---
title: "United Kingdom — Children &amp; Vulnerable Groups | Data Protection Monitor"
canonical: https://dataprotection.gi/jurisdictions/united-kingdom/children-and-vulnerable-groups/
source_html: /jurisdictions/united-kingdom/children-and-vulnerable-groups/index.html
description: "United Kingdom — Children & Vulnerable Groups (Amber, 5 sub-modules, 5 claims): Children"
generated_at: 2026-10-25T04:46:50Z
content_sha256: 4ca6800d9a9486b029ff4cab25037632d6da4e4dbb69472346d30424ed189129
generator: "fe-fleet/md-twin@1.0"
---
# United Kingdom — Children &amp; Vulnerable Groups | Data Protection Monitor

### D9Children & Vulnerable Groups5 sub-modules5 claimsAmber&#9662;#

Children&#x27;s protections are mature, statutory and actively enforced (amber reflects ongoing enforcement gaps industry-wide); dependent-adults sub-module is an evidenced gap.

Primary framework Age Appropriate Design Code (Children&#x27;s code), DPA 2018 s.125; UK GDPR

Supervisory authority [Information Commissioner&#x27;s Office (ICO)](https://ico.org.uk/)

Traffic-light rationale &mdash; Amber Children&#x27;s protections are mature, statutory and actively enforced (amber reflects ongoing enforcement gaps industry-wide); dependent-adults sub-module is an evidenced gap.

#### Sub-modules (5)

#### Key findings (1)

- Reddit and MediaLab fined for children&#x27;s privacy/age-assurance failures. &mdash; [Reddit issued with £14.47m fine for children&#x27;s privacy failures](https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/)

Category narrative 209 words

The UK sets the digital age of consent for Information Society Services (ISS) at 13 under Art. 8 UK GDPR and s.9 DPA 2018 (where a child is under 13 and the controller relies on consent, parental responsibility holder authorisation is required). Beyond Art. 8 consent, the statutory Age Appropriate Design Code (Children&#x27;s Code, issued under s.123 DPA 2018 and in force since September 2021) applies to ALL online services &#x27;likely to be accessed by children&#x27; under 18 regardless of lawful basis, mandating 15 standards anchored in the best interests of the child: high privacy by default, geolocation off by default, minimal data collection, no nudge techniques, and a default prohibition on profiling children for behavioural advertising. From 5 February 2026, DUAA 2025 s.81 inserts Art. 25(1B) UK GDPR (&#x27; children&#x27;s higher protection matters&#x27;), requiring providers of ISS likely to be accessed by children explicitly to embed children&#x27;s higher protection into Art. 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default assessments. Active enforcement is demonstrated by the ICO&#x27;s £14.47 million fine against Reddit, Inc. on 23 February 2026 for unlawful processing of under-13s&#x27; data, failure to deploy effective age assurance, and failure to complete a Children&#x27;s Code DPIA, alongside parallel Ofcom age-assurance enforcement under the Online Safety Act 2023.

Evidence 5

Sources and claims (5)
- Confirmed[Information Commissioner&#x27;s Office](https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/childrens-information/childrens-code-guidance-and-resources/introduction-to-the-childrens-code/) &mdash; The Children&#x27;s code applies to information society services likely to be accessed by children under 18, including UK-based and non-UK companies processing UK children&#x27;s personal data, even if children are not the target audience.observed 2026-07-28
- Confirmed[Information Commissioner&#x27;s Office](https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/) &mdash; The ICO fined Reddit £14.47m for failing to apply any robust age assurance mechanism, resulting in no lawful basis for processing personal information of children under 13.observed 2026-07-28
- Confirmed[Information Commissioner&#x27;s Office](https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/imgur-owner-medialab-fined-over-children-s-privacy-failures/) &mdash; The ICO fined MediaLab (Imgur) £247,590 for failing to implement any age assurance measures to determine the age of users between September 2021 and September 2025, exposing children to harmful content.observed 2026-07-28
- Confirmed[Information Commissioner&#x27;s Office](https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/imgur-owner-medialab-fined-over-children-s-privacy-failures/) &mdash; UK law requires that online services using personal information of children under 13 rely on consent given by the child&#x27;s parent or carer where consent is the chosen lawful basis; MediaLab was found to lack such parental consent measures for Imgur.observed 2026-07-28
- Confirmed[Information Commissioner&#x27;s Office](https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/childrens-information/childrens-code-guidance-and-resources/age-appropriate-design-a-code-of-practice-for-online-services/code-standards/) &mdash; Children&#x27;s code Standard 10 requires profiling to be switched off by default unless the organisation can demonstrate a compelling reason accounting for the best interests of the child, with protections against harmful content effects.observed 2026-07-28
