#
Cookie/tracker consent regime is mature and green, but clean-room and cross-context-advertising sub-modules have no identified DE-specific statutory basis, and dark-pattern guidance rests on DSK soft-law rather than binding statute.
Sub-modules (6)
Cookies And TrackersGreen
TTDSG §25(1) consent requirement for terminal-equipment storage/access, narrow §25(2) strict-necessity exception.
Claims (2):
- TTDSG/TDDDG §25(1) requires consent for storage of or access to information on end-user terminal equipment regardless of whether personal data processing occurs.
- TTDSG/TDDDG §25(2) provides a narrow strict-necessity exception to the cookie/tracker consent requirement.
Dark PatternsAmber
DSK guidance treats cookie walls as non-compliant, though this rests on soft-law/regulatory guidance rather than a codified statutory prohibition.
Claims (1):
- DSK (Konferenz der unabhängigen Datenschutzaufsichtsbehörden) treats cookie walls as non-compliant, per soft-law guidance rather than a codified statutory prohibition. No DSK-specific cookie-wall guidance document independently retrieved this pass; general Telemedien Rundschreiben used as proxy.
Opt Out SignalsRed
No DE-specific statutory recognition of Global Privacy Control or equivalent opt-out signals was identified.
Absence provenance: unavailable. Searched: Global Privacy Control Deutschland TTDSG Anerkennung.
Clean Rooms And DcrRed
No DE-specific clean-room/data-collaboration-room statutory regime was identified.
Absence provenance: unavailable. Searched: Clean Room Datenschutz Deutschland Regelung.
Cross Context AdvertisingAmber
No CPRA-style statutory 'sale'/'share' concept exists in German law; cross-context advertising is governed by general GDPR consent/legitimate-interest rules.
Absence provenance: unavailable. Searched: cross-context advertising Germany equivalent CPRA sale share.
Direct MarketingGreen
Art 21(2) GDPR absolute objection right to direct-marketing processing, operationalised via BfDI model objection letters.
Claims (1):
- GDPR Article 21(2) grants an absolute objection right to direct-marketing processing, operationalised via BfDI model objection correspondence.
Key findings (3)
- — source on file
- — source on file
- — source on file
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and claims (4)
- ProbableBfDI — TTDSG/TDDDG §25(1) requires consent for storage of or access to information on end-user terminal equipment regardless of whether personal data processing occurs.observed
- ProbableOneTrust DataGuidance — TTDSG/TDDDG §25(2) provides a narrow strict-necessity exception to the cookie/tracker consent requirement.observed
- UncertainBfDI — DSK (Konferenz der unabhängigen Datenschutzaufsichtsbehörden) treats cookie walls as non-compliant, per soft-law guidance rather than a codified statutory prohibition. No DSK-specific cookie-wall guidance document independently retrieved this pass; general Telemedien Rundschreiben used as proxy.observed
- ProbableBfDI — GDPR Article 21(2) grants an absolute objection right to direct-marketing processing, operationalised via BfDI model objection correspondence.observed