content: lawyer_reviewedreviewed by Ramparts · Peter Pink-Howitt · 2026-10-24legal review: reviewed (informational)publication gate: 0 failing39 sources retrievedmodel claude-sonnet-5 · 2026-08-05
European Economic Area (Bloc) Data Protection & Privacy Regulation
EEAschema gdpri-v2trajectory: not yet assessedregulated (omnibus)overlaps: Sentinel (AML/CFT), World Payments, artificial-intelligence
Last updated · 10 categories · 90
claims · 66 sources in the cumulative register
On 21 October 2026, the Council's Permanent Representatives Committee agreed its negotiating mandate on the European Commission's Digital Omnibus proposal, COM(2025) 837, which would amend the GDPR's definition of personal data under Article 4(1), the interplay between fines methodology and Article 83(2), and related provisions.
Data collected · Data published
Expert reviewed as at 24 Oct 2026 · peter-pink-howitt-ramparts
Not fully checked this cycle: Regulator & Framework, Enforcement & Redress (2 open gaps).
Evidence re-verified:·Position last changed:·Record history & provenance ▾
Methodology & record provenance: Module confidence is derived from the underlying claims (source tier and primary excerpt retention), while statutory legal force is tracked independently.
Framework postureRegulated (omnibus)10 of 10 modules populated · Expert-reviewed
Lead supervisory authorityEuropean Data Protection Board (EDPB), coordinating the national supervisory authoritPrimary statutory & supervisory perimeter
Next milestone (> 2026-10-26)None scheduledNo dated future statutory milestone on record
Traffic-light mix(sums to 10 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories are currently flagged red.
Member jurisdictions
This page covers law made at European Economic Area (Bloc) level once. Each member’s page covers implementation, national authorities, national options and local enforcement (30 of 30 members covered here).
EEA operates under a regulated (omnibus) supervised by European Data Protection Board (EDPB), coordinating the national supervisory authorit, with 10 regulatory modules assessed in the current cycle.
D1 · Regulator & Framework: Harmonised 30-state EEA regime anchored in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), updated by the Cross-Border Procedural Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 (adopted 26 Nov 2025, entered into force 1 Jan 2026, applicable 2 April 2027) and active legislative negotiations on the Digital Omnibus Proposal COM(2025) 837 final.
D2 · Lawful Processing: Core provisions are stable and enforced, but the Digital Omnibus proposal (still in trilogue as of mid-2026) creates near-term uncertainty over consent-signal mechanics and the sensitive-data/AI derogation.
D3 · Data Subject Rights: Rights are robustly enforced and subject to active coordinated supervisory scrutiny, but a pending legislative change (abuse-of-access-rights clarification) could alter practical scope.
D4 · Controller & Processor: Baseline obligations are stable and well-enforced, but simplification proposals (still in trilogue) will materially change SME/SMC recordkeeping and breach-notification thresholds once adopted.
All 10 module posture summaries
D1 · Regulator & Framework: Harmonised 30-state EEA regime anchored in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), updated by the Cross-Border Procedural Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 (adopted 26 Nov 2025, entered into force 1 Jan 2026, applicable 2 April 2027) and active legislative negotiations on the Digital Omnibus Proposal COM(2025) 837 final.
D2 · Lawful Processing: Core provisions are stable and enforced, but the Digital Omnibus proposal (still in trilogue as of mid-2026) creates near-term uncertainty over consent-signal mechanics and the sensitive-data/AI derogation.
D3 · Data Subject Rights: Rights are robustly enforced and subject to active coordinated supervisory scrutiny, but a pending legislative change (abuse-of-access-rights clarification) could alter practical scope.
D4 · Controller & Processor: Baseline obligations are stable and well-enforced, but simplification proposals (still in trilogue) will materially change SME/SMC recordkeeping and breach-notification thresholds once adopted.
D5 · Cross-Border & Adequacy: Comprehensive Chapter V transfer architecture with 17 active European Commission adequacy decisions (including UK adequacy renewed on 19 December 2025 until 27 December 2031, European Patent Organisation adequacy in July 2025, and Brazil adequacy adopted 27 January 2026) and the EU–US Data Privacy Framework upheld by the General Court in Case T-553/23 Latombe v Commission (3 September 2025), balanced against active DPC/EDPB transfer enforcement (TikTok €530m fine, May 2025; Case T-354/22 Bindl v Commission, Jan 2025).
D6 · Sectoral Watch: Health and telecoms/eprivacy overlays are actively evidenced; other sectoral overlays (financial, employment, education, insurance) lack direct 2026 sourcing in this pass and are flagged as gaps.
D7 · AdTech & Marketing: Cookie-consent fatigue is a recognised, unresolved policy problem; the principal legislative fix (Art. 88b) is currently stalled in the Council, leaving practical mechanics unsettled.
D8 · AI, Biometrics & Automated: Article 22 is settled law with recent CJEU interpretation, but the practical GDPR/AI Act interface remains in active development pending joint EDPB-Commission guidelines and AI Act simplification.
D9 · Children's Privacy: Core Article 8 mechanism is well-established law, but dedicated children's-data guidelines remain in development and several sub-areas (age verification specifics, education settings, dependent adults) lack direct 2026 sourcing in this pass.
D10 · Enforcement & Redress: Enforcement powers are broad, actively used at scale (billion-euro-class fines), collective redress mechanisms are in force, and a further procedural-harmonisation regulation is already adopted (pending 2027 application).
Key regulatory facts for European Economic Area (Bloc)
Regulatory Dimension
European Economic Area (Bloc) Standing Position
Jurisdiction
European Economic Area (Bloc) (EEA)
Regulatory Scope
Data Protection & Privacy Regulation (10 modules, 90 sourced findings)
Regulator & Framework
Harmonised 30-state EEA regime anchored in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), updated by the Cross-Border Procedural Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 (adopted 26 Nov 2025, entered into force 1 Jan 2026, applicable 2 April...
Lawful Processing & Special Data
Core provisions are stable and enforced, but the Digital Omnibus proposal (still in trilogue as of mid-2026) creates near-term uncertainty over consent-signal mechanics and the sensitive-data/AI derogation.
Data Subject Rights
Rights are robustly enforced and subject to active coordinated supervisory scrutiny, but a pending legislative change (abuse-of-access-rights clarification) could alter practical scope.
Controller/Processor Duties
Baseline obligations are stable and well-enforced, but simplification proposals (still in trilogue) will materially change SME/SMC recordkeeping and breach-notification thresholds once adopted.
Primary Instruments Cited
EDPS, IAPP, CNIL, European Economic Area (Bloc) Statutory Instrument reg/2025/2518/oj, IAPP
Last Confirmed / Updated
2026-11-04 (66 sources in cumulative register)
10 of 10 categories
Signal
Density
Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.
Harmonised 30-state EEA regime anchored in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), updated by the Cross-Border Procedural Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 (adopted 26 Nov 2025, entered into force 1 Jan 2026, applicable 2 April 2027) and active legislative negotiations on the Digital Omnibus Proposal COM(2025) 837 final.
Primary frameworkRegulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), incorporated into the EEA Agreement (Annex XI)
Traffic-light rationale — AmberHarmonised 30-state EEA regime anchored in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), updated by the Cross-Border Procedural Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 (adopted 26 Nov 2025, entered into force 1 Jan 2026, applicable 2 April 2027) and active legislative negotiations on the Digital Omnibus Proposal COM(2025) 837 final.
Sub-modules (5)
Category narrative245 words
The European Economic Area (EEA) data protection regime applies across all 27 EU Member States and the 3 EEA EFTA states (Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, where the GDPR was incorporated into Annex XI to the EEA Agreement by EEA Joint Committee Decision No 154/2018 effective 20 July 2018). The core architecture comprises Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), Directive (EU) 2016/680 (Law Enforcement Directive), Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy Directive, following the European Commission's formal withdrawal of the long-stalled ePrivacy Regulation proposal in February 2025), and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (EUDPR for EU institutions). Supervision is decentralised across national Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in each of the 30 EEA states (including decentralized Land-level DPAs in Germany) coordinated through the One-Stop-Shop (Art. 56) and Consistency Mechanism (Arts. 60–65) by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), in which the three EEA EFTA DPAs (Datatilsynet Norway, Persónuvernd Iceland, DSS Liechtenstein) and the EFTA Surveillance Authority participate as full operational members without voting rights or eligibility to hold the Chair (Decision No 154/2018). Two major legislative developments reshape the framework in 2025–2026: first, Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 on additional procedural rules for cross-border GDPR enforcement was enacted on 26 November 2025 (OJ L, 12.12.2025), entered into force on 1 January 2026, and applies from 2 April 2027; second, on 19 November 2025 the European Commission tabled the Digital Omnibus Regulation proposal (COM(2025) 837 final; EDPB–EDPS Joint Opinion 2/2026 issued 10 February 2026), proposing targeted amendments to the GDPR, ePrivacy Directive, Data Act, and AI Act.
Sources and claims (17)
ConfirmedEDPS — National data protection authorities of the EU Member States and the EEA EFTA states (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway) are the primary enforcement bodies for the GDPR, cooperating through the EDPB's consistency and cooperation framework.observed
ConfirmedIAPP — The EDPB may issue binding decisions under Article 65 GDPR that direct a lead supervisory authority to alter proposed measures, including materially increasing proposed fines, as occurred in the Meta Ireland Facebook/Instagram inquiries where the EDPB directed the fine be raised from a proposed maximum of €59 million to €390 million.observed
ConfirmedCNIL — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) repealed and replaced Directive 95/46/EC as the EU's general data protection framework.observed
Confirmedhttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/2518/oj — Regulation (EU) 2025/2518, laying down additional procedural rules for GDPR cross-border enforcement (harmonising complaint admissibility, lead/concerned-authority cooperation and party rights), was adopted on 26 November 2025, published in the Official Journal on 12 December 2025, and applies from 2 April 2027.
ConfirmedCNIL — GDPR Article 2 material scope covers processing of personal data by automated means and manual processing forming part of a filing system, as reflected in EDPB and CNIL guidance defining personal data broadly (any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person).observed
ConfirmedIAPP — Since 25 May 2018, GDPR applies to processing in the context of an EU/EEA establishment's activities and to processing by non-established controllers/processors targeting EEA data subjects through the offering of goods or services or the monitoring of their behaviour within the Union.observed
ConfirmedEDPB — An EDPB report on extraterritorial enforcement notes that any exercise of a DPA's investigative powers outside EU/EEA territory requires the consent of the foreign state, limiting practical extraterritorial reach notwithstanding Article 3's broad scope.observed
ConfirmedCNIL — The GDPR is generally understood to have abolished the ex-ante notification/registration regime that existed under Directive 95/46/EC, substituting an accountability-based compliance model (Article 5(2), Article 24).observed
ProbableLegiscope — European Data Protection Board comprises: The EDPB's membership consists of the head of each national supervisory authority, one per EU Member State plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.observed
Confirmedhttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/2518/oj — Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 extends deadline: Reforms GDPR cross-border enforcement procedure (complaint admissibility, lead/concerned-authority cooperation, party rights); adopted 26 Nov 2025, published in the OJ 12 Dec 2025, applying from 2 Apr 2027.
Probableppc.land (explainer, corroborating official EFTA dates) — GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) — Incorporated into the EEA Agreement by EEA Joint Committee Decision No 154/2018 of 6 July 2018, entering into force in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway on 20 July 2018.observed
ConfirmedEFTA EEA-Lex factsheet (AI Act) — AI Act, DSA, Data Act — None has been incorporated into the EEA Agreement for Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway as of this cycle; each is listed by EFTA as under scrutiny with a draft Joint Committee Decision pending.observed
ProbableQuasa — Digital Omnibus Regulation (2025/0360 COD) — Coreper failed to adopt a Council negotiating mandate on 7 October 2026 and again on 11 October 2026, principally over Data Act trade-secret provisionsobserved
Probableppc.land (explainer, corroborating official EFTA dates) — The EDPB's membership consists of the head of each national supervisory authority, one per EU Member State plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.observed
Probableppc.land (explainer, corroborating official EFTA dates) — European Data Protection Board — The EDPB's membership consists of the head of each national supervisory authority, one per EU Member State plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.observed
ProbableEFTA EEA-Lex factsheet (AI Act) — Regulation (EU) 2025/2518 — Reforms GDPR cross-border enforcement procedure (complaint admissibility, lead/concerned-authority cooperation, party rights); adopted 26 Nov 2025, published in the OJ 12 Dec 2025, applying from 2 Apr 2027.observed
ProbableLegal247 — Digital Omnibus proposal COM(2025) 837 — On 21 October 2026 Coreper agreed the Council's negotiating mandate on the Commission's Digital Omnibus proposal, which would amend GDPR Art 4(1) (personal data definition), Art 83(2) (fines methodology interplay) and related provisions; the mandate keeps the current personal-data definition, permits AI training on the legitimate-interest basis, and supports a 4-month (reduced from 6-month) breach-notification re-request deadline.observed
Core provisions are stable and enforced, but the Digital Omnibus proposal (still in trilogue as of mid-2026) creates near-term uncertainty over consent-signal mechanics and the sensitive-data/AI derogation.
Primary frameworkGDPR Articles 4-11 (Regulation (EU) 2016/679); proposed amendments under the Digital Omnibus (COM(2025) 836 final)
Traffic-light rationale — AmberCore provisions are stable and enforced, but the Digital Omnibus proposal (still in trilogue as of mid-2026) creates near-term uncertainty over consent-signal mechanics and the sensitive-data/AI derogation.
D2 · Lawful Processing — Full Module Record4 sub-modules · 314 words · 8 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Rights are robustly enforced and subject to active coordinated supervisory scrutiny, but a pending legislative change (abuse-of-access-rights clarification) could alter practical scope.
Traffic-light rationale — AmberRights are robustly enforced and subject to active coordinated supervisory scrutiny, but a pending legislative change (abuse-of-access-rights clarification) could alter practical scope.
Sub-modules (5)
Category narrative257 words
Chapter III (Arts. 12–23) GDPR guarantees transparent information (Arts. 13–14), right of access and a free first copy of personal data undergoing processing (Art. 15; CJEU Case C-487/21 Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and Case C-307/22 FT v DW confirming the right to a free initial copy of medical records even when requested for non-data-protection litigation), rectification (Art. 16), erasure / right to be forgotten (Art. 17), restriction (Art. 18), data portability (Art. 20, reinforced from 12 September 2025 by real-time IoT/connected-product data switching rights under the EU Data Act Regulation (EU) 2023/2854), objection (Art. 21, unconditional for direct marketing), and rights against solely automated decision-making (Art. 22). In Case C-203/22 Dun & Bradstreet Austria (27 February 2025), the CJEU held that under Art. 15(1)(h) GDPR a controller conducting automated credit scoring must explain the actual procedure and principles applied to the data subject's profile so the individual can verify accuracy and consistency, and cannot rely on a blanket 'trade secrets' refusal (instead disclosing contested algorithms to the DPA or court for case-by-case balancing). Response deadlines under Art. 12(3) are one calendar month from receipt, extendable by two further months for complex or numerous requests upon notice within the first month. Under the Digital Omnibus Proposal COM(2025) 837 final (legislative proposal, not yet in force), the Commission has proposed clarifying Art. 12(5) so that abusive DSARs pursued solely for non-data-protection purposes (such as pre-trial discovery abuse) may be treated as manifestly unfounded or excessive, though the EDPB–EDPS Joint Opinion 2/2026 (10 February 2026) opposed restricting access rights on motive grounds.
Sources and claims (5)
ConfirmedEDPB — The CJEU has confirmed (Case C-307/22) that data subjects may legitimately exercise the Article 15 right of access for objectives other than becoming aware of processing or verifying its lawfulness, without needing to provide particular motivation.observed
ConfirmedEDPB — The EDPB ran a year-long 2025 Coordinated Enforcement Framework action on the Article 17 right to erasure/right to be forgotten, adopting a report on the action's findings in 2026.observed
ConfirmedEDPB — The right to data portability under Article 20 GDPR continues to be interpreted per the WP29 Guidelines on the right to data portability, as endorsed by the EDPB.observed
ConfirmedEDPB — During 2026, 25 DPAs across Europe are participating in the EDPB's Coordinated Enforcement Framework action assessing controller compliance with Article 12-14 transparency and information obligations that condition the effective exercise of data subject rights.observed
Baseline obligations are stable and well-enforced, but simplification proposals (still in trilogue) will materially change SME/SMC recordkeeping and breach-notification thresholds once adopted.
Primary frameworkGDPR Articles 24-39 (Regulation (EU) 2016/679); Digital Omnibus (COM(2025) 836 final)
Traffic-light rationale — AmberBaseline obligations are stable and well-enforced, but simplification proposals (still in trilogue) will materially change SME/SMC recordkeeping and breach-notification thresholds once adopted.
D4 · Controller & Processor — Full Module Record7 sub-modules · 262 words · 5 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Comprehensive Chapter V transfer architecture with 17 active European Commission adequacy decisions (including UK adequacy renewed on 19 December 2025 until 27 December 2031, European Patent Organisation adequacy in July 2025, and Brazil adequacy adopted 27 January 2026) and the EU–US Data Privacy Framework upheld by the General Court in Case T-553/23 Latombe v Commission (3 September 2025), balanced against active DPC/EDPB transfer enforcement (TikTok €530m fine, May 2025; Case T-354/22 Bindl v Commission, Jan 2025).
Traffic-light rationale — AmberComprehensive Chapter V transfer architecture with 17 active European Commission adequacy decisions (including UK adequacy renewed on 19 December 2025 until 27 December 2031, European Patent Organisation adequacy in July 2025, and Brazil adequacy adopted 27 January 2026) and the EU–US Data Privacy Framework upheld by the General Court in Case T-553/23 Latombe v Commission (3 September 2025), balanced against active DPC/EDPB transfer enforcement (TikTok €530m fine, May 2025; Case T-354/22 Bindl v Commission, Jan 2025).
D5 · Cross-Border & Adequacy — Full Module Record6 sub-modules · 309 words · 12 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Health and telecoms/eprivacy overlays are actively evidenced; other sectoral overlays (financial, employment, education, insurance) lack direct 2026 sourcing in this pass and are flagged as gaps.
Traffic-light rationale — AmberHealth and telecoms/eprivacy overlays are actively evidenced; other sectoral overlays (financial, employment, education, insurance) lack direct 2026 sourcing in this pass and are flagged as gaps.
D6 · Sectoral Watch — Full Module Record8 sub-modules · 241 words · 11 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Cookie-consent fatigue is a recognised, unresolved policy problem; the principal legislative fix (Art. 88b) is currently stalled in the Council, leaving practical mechanics unsettled.
Traffic-light rationale — AmberCookie-consent fatigue is a recognised, unresolved policy problem; the principal legislative fix (Art. 88b) is currently stalled in the Council, leaving practical mechanics unsettled.
D7 · AdTech & Marketing — Full Module Record6 sub-modules · 247 words · 7 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Article 22 is settled law with recent CJEU interpretation, but the practical GDPR/AI Act interface remains in active development pending joint EDPB-Commission guidelines and AI Act simplification.
Traffic-light rationale — AmberArticle 22 is settled law with recent CJEU interpretation, but the practical GDPR/AI Act interface remains in active development pending joint EDPB-Commission guidelines and AI Act simplification.
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Core Article 8 mechanism is well-established law, but dedicated children's-data guidelines remain in development and several sub-areas (age verification specifics, education settings, dependent adults) lack direct 2026 sourcing in this pass.
Traffic-light rationale — AmberCore Article 8 mechanism is well-established law, but dedicated children's-data guidelines remain in development and several sub-areas (age verification specifics, education settings, dependent adults) lack direct 2026 sourcing in this pass.
D9 · Children's Privacy — Full Module Record5 sub-modules · 198 words · 2 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Enforcement powers are broad, actively used at scale (billion-euro-class fines), collective redress mechanisms are in force, and a further procedural-harmonisation regulation is already adopted (pending 2027 application).
Traffic-light rationale — GreenEnforcement powers are broad, actively used at scale (billion-euro-class fines), collective redress mechanisms are in force, and a further procedural-harmonisation regulation is already adopted (pending 2027 application).
D10 · Enforcement & Redress — Full Module Record6 sub-modules · 334 words · 11 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04
The decision headline, regulatory posture (Green), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Single-Monitor or Portfolio Pro (1 seat) or Firm (up to 8 seats + client-advisory rights).
Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across
groups.
Provenance and declared absence
Disclosure model: category cards load OPEN; narratives render in full; standing narratives load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.
Sub-modules are DP-specific nested subsections with their own real per-sub-module traffic light, rendered under each category across all regulatory modules.
Traffic-light dots are REAL data (baseline.<category>.traffic_light), not renderer-invented taxonomy, and are never suppressed -- unlike WPM, where a RAG dot would be forbidden as invented severity.
Family/accent taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field; it decorates the RAG dot, it does not replace it. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.
Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score. Not shown on this page.
Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-11-04. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.
Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 10 categories, 58 sub-module(s), 90 claim(s) (90 category placement(s)), 66 source(s) in the cumulative register.